What Sean Duffy’s Appointment Means for U.S. Roads, Rail, and Transit
Sean Duffy’s appointment as the US Secretary of Transportation comes at a pivotal moment for American infrastructure. With a background as a former congressman and media personality, Duffy enters the role as billions in federal transportation funding hang in the balance. His leadership is expected to shape the implementation—or potential rollback—of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), two major legislative achievements of the previous administration.
One of Duffy’s first challenges is navigating President Trump’s recent executive order, which calls for an immediate pause on federal funding for projects under these laws. This move has sparked widespread uncertainty among state and local governments, transportation planners, and industry stakeholders who rely on these funds for critical infrastructure improvements.
What’s at stake for roads, highways, and bridges?
The IIJA, signed into law in 2021, allocated $1.2 trillion to upgrade America’s aging transportation network, including roads, bridges, and highways. States were expecting a steady flow of federal dollars to repair crumbling infrastructure, improve traffic flow, and expand highway capacity.
However, with Trump’s executive order halting new disbursements, projects that were set to break ground in 2025 now face indefinite delays. Departments of transportation in multiple states have raised concerns that prolonged uncertainty could lead to contract cancellations, higher costs, and even job losses in the construction sector. Some states may need to rely on short-term borrowing to keep projects moving while they await clarity from Washington.
Public transit and rail at risk of funding cuts
The IRA and IIJA also included historic investments in rail and public transit, aiming to modernize aging systems and expand service to underserved areas. Amtrak, which was poised to receive billions for fleet upgrades and new routes, now faces an unclear financial future. Similarly, major city transit agencies that had planned expansions of bus and rail networks are scrambling to reassess their funding strategies.
Republican lawmakers and fiscal conservatives argue that scaling back federal transit spending is necessary to reduce the deficit and prioritize highway infrastructure. However, transit advocates warn that cutbacks could disproportionately affect lower-income communities that rely on public transportation. If federal grants are withdrawn, cities may have to increase fares, reduce service, or delay expansion plans.
A pause on billions in federal transportation funding
President Trump’s executive order, issued shortly after taking office in January 2025, directs federal agencies to halt the disbursement of funds from both the IIJA and IRA. This move, framed as a reassessment of federal spending priorities, has left state and local governments in a state of limbo.
The funding freeze affects a wide range of transportation initiatives, including:
- Highway and bridge repairs – States relying on IIJA funding for critical road maintenance and bridge replacements may need to scale back or delay projects.
- Public transit expansions – Planned subway, bus rapid transit, and commuter rail expansions in major metro areas could be put on hold.
- Amtrak and intercity rail – Amtrak’s much-anticipated corridor improvements, including new routes and high-speed rail projects, may face funding gaps.
- Electric vehicle infrastructure – The IRA’s provisions for nationwide EV charging networks are now uncertain, slowing progress toward a cleaner transportation sector.
Some states, particularly those led by Democratic governors, have vowed to continue these projects using state-level funds. Others, however, lack the financial resources to make up for the sudden loss of federal support.
Legal challenges and congressional pushback
The executive order has already sparked backlash from lawmakers and legal experts who argue that the president lacks the authority to unilaterally block funds approved by Congress. The US Constitution grants Congress the ‘power of the purse,’ meaning that the legislative branch, not the executive, controls federal spending.
Democratic lawmakers have signaled that they may pursue legal action to challenge the order, while some Republican senators have also voiced concerns about the impact on their home states. The dispute could escalate into a major legal battle, with courts potentially determining whether the administration has overstepped its authority.
How Sean Duffy’s leadership could shape the future of US transportation
Duffy’s track record suggests that his tenure as US Secretary of Transportation may focus on deregulation, private-sector involvement, and shifting federal priorities toward highway expansion. As a former congressman from Wisconsin, Duffy has consistently supported reducing government oversight in industries ranging from finance to infrastructure. His appointment signals a potential departure from the previous administration’s emphasis on sustainability and public transit.
Duffy has already indicated that he will conduct a ‘top-to-bottom review’ of federal transportation programs, including those established under the IIJA and IRA. While he has not yet provided specifics, transportation analysts speculate that his leadership could prioritize:
- Highway and roadway expansion – Expect a renewed focus on highway development, with less emphasis on alternative transportation modes such as rail and public transit.
- Public-private partnerships (P3s) – Duffy has previously expressed support for P3s, which could lead to an increased role for private investors in infrastructure projects, particularly in toll roads and freight rail.
- Reduced regulations on autonomous and electric vehicles – A longtime proponent of emerging transportation technologies, Duffy may push for streamlined regulations that encourage the adoption of autonomous vehicles and EVs while reducing federal incentives for clean-energy initiatives.
Public transit faces an uncertain future
Public transit agencies, already struggling with post-pandemic ridership declines, may be among the hardest hit by shifts in federal policy. Duffy has not explicitly stated his stance on public transit funding, but if his focus aligns with the administration’s broader policy agenda, cities may see reduced federal support for bus and rail systems.
Some transit agencies are already bracing for potential budget shortfalls. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York, for example, had been counting on federal aid for long-term capital improvements. If these funds are frozen or reallocated, agencies may need to explore fare hikes, service cuts, or state-level funding solutions to compensate.
While the Department of Transportation has broad authority over federal infrastructure projects, Congress ultimately controls the budget. If lawmakers push back against the administration’s funding decisions, we could see legislative efforts to protect or redirect transportation funding. Additionally, legal challenges to the executive order could lead to delays in its implementation, particularly if courts determine that the administration lacks the authority to block previously approved spending.
Sources:
To keep up-to-date with our latest transportation and logistics news, subscribe to our newsletter today.